I didn't do a great job eating right this month, but I still hoped for a better MAF Test. It was not to be! Here are my splits:
Sports Complex (5km) at 121-131bpm:
| |
October 31 |
November 30 |
January 5 |
January 31 |
| Kilometer 1 |
8:19 |
8:10 |
8:04 |
8:28 |
| Kilometer 2 |
8:45 |
8:49 |
8:26 |
9:01 |
| Kilometer 3 |
9:26 |
8:44 |
8:51 |
9:05 |
| Kilometer 4 |
9:23 |
8:55 |
9:13 |
9:12 |
| Kilometer 5 |
9:34 |
9:00 |
9:20 |
9:18 |
| |
45:26 |
43:38 |
43:54 |
45:03 |
| Pace (min/mi) |
14:37 |
14:03 |
14:08 |
14:31 |
I was really puzzled about this. I could have expected to have stayed the same, but to regress? I really don't know.
But I have just stumbled upon the concept of
Metabolic Efficiency Training (MET), which more or less uses the same aerobic training principles as Maffetone but with a greater emphasis on eating right in order to maximize burning fat as fuel. This is one area I have completely ignored. So this month I am going to be mostly free of grains (bread, rice, and noodles) and sugars, and we'll see if that has any effect. The MET people also recommend at least 6 hours a week of MET training, whereas I rarely get over 5 hours a week. In fact as I look at my training, I see a correlation. In November, I ran 22.5 hours and saw much improvement. In December I ran 19 hours and regressed. And then in January I ran just
under 16 hours and regressed further. Could that be it?
All in all, I am not all that discouraged with my results (although I'd gladly take a faster pace!), because I'm running more than I ever have, with no injury or soreness. Not a bad way to spend the off-season, regardless of my improvement or lack thereof.